← Back to all articles

Roshan Singh29 January 20267 min read

You Don’t Need More Practice. You Need Less Anxiety.

A big chunk of JEE underperformance is not concept gaps. It is anxiety stealing working memory. A blunt, research-backed protocol to train calm under pressure.

You Don’t Need More Practice. You Need Less Anxiety.

You Don’t Need More Practice. You Need Less Anxiety.

A lot of JEE advice is built on a cruel misunderstanding.

You miss a question, so people tell you to “work harder.”

You freeze in a mock, so they tell you to “solve more problems.”

You blank out on an easy algebra step, so they tell you to “revise the chapter again.”

Sometimes that is true.

But a huge chunk of JEE underperformance is not a knowledge problem.

It is an anxiety problem.

Not the dramatic kind. The quiet kind.

The kind that steals working memory, makes you rush, and turns good students into reckless guessers.

Coaching thrives on this. Anxiety sells.

If you can keep your brain calm under time pressure, you can do fewer hours and still beat someone doing 14-hour days with a panicked mind.

This is not softness. It is mechanics.

Anxiety is not “in your head”. It is in your working memory.

When you solve a JEE question, you are doing two things at once:

  • holding intermediate steps in mind
  • selecting the next move

Working memory is the scratchpad.

Anxiety taxes that scratchpad.

You can feel it: the moment you panic, your brain becomes stupid. You forget what you knew ten minutes ago.

This pattern is not controversial.

A large meta-analysis has shown that math anxiety relates to worse math performance, and a key pathway is working memory.

The point is not “be confident.”

The point is: if your working memory is being occupied by fear, there is less space left for physics, chemistry, and math.

So if you keep grinding without reducing anxiety, you are training in a handicap state.

Coaching creates anxiety on purpose

Coaching is a factory.

Factories need predictable output.

An anxious student is easy to control.

They will attend every class.

They will buy every booklet.

They will ask for “a plan” instead of building one.

They will outsource thinking.

They will confuse obedience with learning.

The coaching industry calls this discipline.

It is dependency.

And it shows up as a very specific kind of study behavior:

  • you do practice to feel safe, not to learn
  • you avoid hard questions because they feel like a threat
  • you check solutions too early because uncertainty is intolerable
  • you take mocks to prove you are serious, not to diagnose

If you relate to this, you are not lazy.

You are over-activated.

Test anxiety is real, measurable, and fixable

Educational psychology has studied test anxiety for decades. Classic reviews lay out the basic model:

  • worry consumes attention
  • physiological arousal makes you rush
  • both reduce performance

Anxiety is not only an emotion. It is a cognitive load.

If you want a competitive advantage, your job is not to eliminate stress.

It is to convert stress into controlled arousal.

That is trainable.

The JEE anxiety loop (and how to break it)

Here is the loop:

  1. You fear losing marks.
  2. You rush to avoid feeling uncertainty.
  3. You make a stupid error.
  4. Your fear becomes justified.
  5. Next time, you rush even more.

Most students try to fix this by “more practice.”

That helps slowly.

There is a faster fix: change the rules of your attempts.

Rule 1: Earn the right to speed

Speed is a reward.

If you are anxious, timed practice early will teach you panic.

You need a progression:

  • untimed, accuracy-first
  • then time-boxed per step
  • then full timed sets

This matches what elite training looks like in any skill. You do not start with the match clock.

You build correct motor patterns first.

Rule 2: Make your mocks boring

A mock should feel like a lab experiment, not a court hearing.

If you treat every mock as a verdict on your future, you will sabotage yourself.

The goal is to produce data:

  • where did you lose marks?
  • was it concept, method choice, algebra, or attention?
  • how many errors were “panic errors”?

Then you turn that into drills.

That is what mocks are for.

If your mock is not generating a new practice plan, it is just anxiety entertainment.

Rule 3: Install a reset ritual

You need a two-minute ritual you can run mid-paper.

Not motivational nonsense. A mechanical reset.

Here is one that works:

  1. Put your pen down.
  2. Exhale slowly for 6 seconds.
  3. Ask: “What is the goal of this question?”
  4. Write one line: “Knowns → unknowns.”
  5. Commit to a first move.

This interrupts rumination.

It gives your brain a handle.

The handle is everything.

Rule 4: Train the “worry budget”

Your brain has a limited attention budget.

If 30 percent of it is running a background process called “what if I fail”, you are solving with 70 percent capacity.

So you train the worry out of the system by exposing yourself to uncertainty on purpose.

Do this:

  • Set a timer for 8 minutes.
  • Attempt a hard problem without looking anything up.
  • When the timer ends, stop.
  • Write what you tried.
  • Only then look at a hint.

This teaches your nervous system that uncertainty is survivable.

Students who cannot tolerate uncertainty become solution addicts.

That addiction is a performance killer.

The hidden killer: shame

JEE culture mixes anxiety with shame.

If you score low, you are treated like you are failing as a person.

This is why students hide their mocks.

This is why they lie.

This is why error logs feel painful.

But shame is just anxiety with a story.

And the story can be rewritten.

Here is the practical rewrite:

A low score is not a verdict.

It is a map.

A map is useful.

A verdict is useless.

A simple daily system that reduces anxiety and increases score

1) One accuracy block (45 minutes)

Pick 6 questions.

Do them slowly.

No timing.

No music.

Your only goal is clean thinking.

If you cannot do this block, you are not ready for speed.

2) One pressure block (30 minutes)

Do 10 questions in 30 minutes.

But with a rule: you are allowed to skip aggressively.

This trains decision-making without panic.

Anxious students get stuck to prove they are serious.

Smart students skip to protect score.

3) One reflection block (15 minutes)

Write three bullets:

  • one concept error
  • one execution error
  • one anxiety error

An anxiety error is any mistake you would not make in a calm state.

That category matters.

It tells you your bottleneck is not knowledge.

It is nervous system control.

Where AI fits

AI can reduce anxiety or amplify it.

If you use AI to get instant answers, you become more fragile. You will need the crutch.

If you use AI to generate controlled uncertainty, you become stronger.

Use it like this:

  • ask for a first hint only (not the solution)
  • ask it to create a similar problem with a twist
  • ask it to quiz you on the setup before any computation

One more use that matters: externalize your worry.

Tell the tutor: “I’m panicking. Ask me 3 clarifying questions about the problem and then give me a single next move.”

That converts emotion into procedure.

Your goal is to keep agency.

The punchline

Marks are not only about intelligence.

They are about how much of your brain is available at exam time.

An anxious student is solving with less RAM.

The fastest way to increase score is to free that RAM.

The coaching industry cannot sell this, because calm students stop buying panic.

So they will keep telling you to do more.

You do not need more.

You need a calmer brain and a sharper protocol.

That is a real edge.

References (for students who like receipts)

  • Hembree (1988). Correlates, Causes, Effects, and Treatment of Test Anxiety. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001047
  • Barroso et al. (2022). Working Memory and Its Mediating Role on the Relationship of Math Anxiety and Math Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.798090
  • Schwarzer et al. (1991). Anxiety and academic performance: A meta-analysis of findings. https://doi.org/10.1080/08917779108248762